Post by Ian BPost by Brad Templetonas Tyrol said, "We're Cylons, and we have been from the start."
Doesn't that line "we're Cylons..." give you some kind of clue?
Not in the slightest? Should it, in a discussion of whether the
word Cylon, to the characters means one thing or another.
It is a tautology. Whatever they think Cylon means is what
they have come to know they are. But it is important to know
that the writers have told us, they have told us, they don't
know what it means. It's just a switch that went off, and they
knew, without knowing what it means to be their type of Cylon.
Post by Ian BPost by Brad TempletonYou can keep saying this but tell me where in the show it demonstrates
this.
I can't think of another way to answer this. The Five know they are Cylons.
The Seven know they are Cylons. They each know the other are Cylons. They
No, the seven believe they know that they were the result of
experiments on adapting human biology to hold the minds of creatures
that started as robots. The seven think they have a history of evolving
from metal robots.
The 5 do not think that, they knew _nothing_ until they got to the 13th
colony, and started to learn bits of their history.
They don't "know they are Cylons" in the same way at all. In fact,
there is nothign in common between the two and their knowledge of their
own histories and how and why they are Cylons.
Post by Ian Bcan test for Cylonness. Everyone called a Cylon in the show is a Cylon and
everyone who isn't called a Cylon isn't a Cylon. How much more demonstration
do you need?
We have never seen the results of a test on the 5. We have, in fact
only seen Baltar's test on #8, and Six's test on the skeletons.
Post by Ian BYes, type of Cylon. Like, Africans and Europeans are different types of
human being, but they're both human beings. Spiny anteaters, on the other
They are not "fundamentally" different. This is more like "Humans
and Chimps" are fundamentally different types of Apes. Well, not that
much like that, but more like that.
Post by Ian BPost by Brad Templetonof other people. If you think they are there, you have to name
them.
I have done multiple times.
Ok, well I missed all of them, so list them again please. Real ways
in which the 5 and 7 have been shown to have similar properties, beyond
the fact that they are both artificial, and can have repressed memories.
Oh, I think there are many ways, I think they _are_ related, but not in
the way you think. But my point is we have not yet been shown. If you
want to debate theories, great. But they are just theories.
I had this debate a lot in season 3. People kept saying "NO way can
characters like Tigh and Adama and etc. be Cylons, because Cylons are
this and Cylons are not. And I kept telling people they were wrong,
they were making a false assumption of similarity. I am surprised
to see it again. There will be similarities, but they are not yet
demonstrated.
Post by Ian BWhat are you saying here? That the Five won't test positive as Cylons? That
the humans will? Do you assert either of these things? If not, you have to
face the inevitability that there are two classes of humanoid creature in
the show; humans and Cylons, and that the Twelve are in the second class and
the rest of the characters are in the first.
I am saying many things are possible. Colonials will not test positive
in #6's detector, or she didn't build it wel as it was designed to test
for that. We have no idea how the Final 5 will test in any detector.
However, that is independent of whether the humans are fully artificial
(ie. Cylons) or just bioengineered (tweaked) or fully natural. Nobody
on the show (except the string puller) knows just what all the beings
are and how they came to be.
I currently suspect there are six classes of humanoids in the show.
a) 7 Cylons (possibly derived from the 5)
b) 5 Cylons
c) 13th tribe (possibly derived from the 5)
d) Lords of Kobol
e) Colonials (possibly made by D)
f) Humans (on original Earth, not 13th colony)
I believe there are relationships. F came first, and I suspect B was
derived from them first, but we don't have a lot to go on.
However, I am not certain of this at all. We don't have enough to know
it's not true, or that it is true. Well, if we wanted to be really
strict about our science, it's clear that the colonials must be
artificial and not natural humans, but we can't always be that strict.
--
Top 10 myths about internet copyright explained
http://www.templetons.com/brad/copymyths.html