Post by Your NamePost by Your NameOn 2022-12-04 08:40:05 +0000, Daniel65 said
Your Name wrote on 4/12/22 8:24 am
On 2022-12-03 19:16:17 +0000, MummyChunk said
http://www.tracking-board.com/exclusive-michael-de-luca-boards-universals-battlestar-galactica-reboot
Post by Your NamePost by Your Name > Michael De Luca has signed on to produce UniversalŽ
featur
Post by Your NamePost by Your Name > adaptation of Glen A. LarsonŽs beloved series BATTLESTA
> GALACTICA. The long-gestating project has reportedly bee
i
Post by Your NamePost by Your Name > development since 1999, but it was put on hold when th
Sci-F
Post by Your NamePost by Your Name > channel picked up its series adaptation, which haile
fro
Post by Your NamePost by Your Name > UniversalŽs sister company NBC Universal Television
Sci-FiŽ
Post by Your NamePost by Your Name > Battlestar Galactica ran for four seasons and is ofte
cite
Post by Your NamePost by Your Name > as one of the netŽs best programs, but the featur
version i
Post by Your NamePost by Your Name > expected to be wholly separate from the televisio
reboot
Post by Your NamePost by Your Name > drawing instead from the original 1978 series
> ...
And.... where is the movie
As of January 2022, a movie (at least one, possibly tw
different ones
Post by Your NamePost by Your Nameand another TV series were still in the works
Memory failing ..... Hasn't Battlestar Galactica already had t
T.V
Post by Your NamePost by Your Nameseries starts already?
There has been Moore-Ron's awful "reboot" series an
its spin-off
Post by Your NamePost by Your NameTV-movies and shows
And now another one!! Sure, it's a movie but which series is i
goin
Post by Your NamePost by Your Nameto follow on from?
There are multiple projects in various states of progress, but non
remotely close to any casting or filming, and likely may never ge
made
https://collider.com/battlestar-galactica-movie-tv-show-shared-universe-simon-kinberg-comments
https://www.denofgeek.com/tv/battlestar-galactica-new-movie-tv-shared-universe
Post by Your NameThere are projects that ignore Moore-Ron's version an
"Galactica 1980"
Post by Your Nameto be a follow-on to the original series (set decades later)
projects
Post by Your Namethat somehow magically link the original series and Moore-Ron's
version, projects that completely re-boot the idea again
Like "Star Trek", and the Marvel and DC superheroes, th
Galactica
Post by Your Namefranchise is now such a confused mess of conflicting version
thanks to
Post by Your Nametalentless idiots with their own ideas of what i
"should" have been,
Post by Your Namethat it has been killed off entirely. :-
I rather enjoyed the series with Edward James Olmo
Just wish the ending had been better regardless of the visual
From W
****
Other critics, even those who wrote rave reviews about the first tw
seasons of the series, felt that a major drop in quality occurred i
the third season, continuing into the fourth and final season. I
particular, the controversial series finale drew heavy criticism
largely due to the view that it failed to explain many of the mai
plotlines which had been teased throughout the series' run. Charli
Jane Anders of io9.com wrote
Even Battlestar Galactica couldn't be Battlestar Galactica for longe
than a few years. By halfway through the third season, the cracks ar
pretty apparent, as the show detours into romance subplots. Th
writers start throwing out curveballs like randomly selected Cylon
and Starbuck's inexplicable (and unexplained) resurrection. By th
time the show ended, its mystique was somewhat tarnished, and it
ending remains controversial.[85
Anders later included the series in her list of "10 Once-Great T
Shows (And The Exact Moments They Started to Suck)", saying
There was a time, not long ago, when BSG was considered the gol
standard for science fiction television. Tense, multilayered
complicated, and filled with morally gray characters it was all th
things we always clamor for but seldom get. The show stumbled somewha
in its third season, with the boxing episode and a boring lov
triangle. But it didn't actually become raw suckage until Starbuc
died for no reason, and then came back from the dead for no reason
The writers have basically admitted they had no plan for killing and
resurrecting Starbuck they just thought it would be a cool thing to
do, and they would figure out the reasons later. And thus, we ended up
with a year of Starbuck Interrupted, constantly shouting "You're
going the wrong way!" and playing the piano while talking about
her daddy.[86]
In a Commentary article on the prevalence of Bush Derangement Syndrome
in popular culture, Jonah Goldberg analyzed the show's "radically
bizarre and nonsensical turn of events ... that led inexorably to its
self-destruction":
Originally, the series was very difficult to pigeonhole ideologically.
... When it came time to make the third season ... a show marked by
gritty realism about how a decent but flawed civilization modeled on
our own tries to cling to its decency while fighting an existential
war against an implacable enemy veered wildly off course. The humans
were no longer analogized to Americans; rather Americans were
analogized to genocidal occupiers. In other words, we are no longer
the inspiration for the futuristic Israelites trying to survive. We
are now the Nazis.[87]
Fantasy author George R.R. Martin expressed his dissatisfaction with
how the writers handled the ending of the TV series, commenting:
Battlestar Galactica ends with 'God Did It.' Looks like somebody
skipped Writing 101, when you learn that a deus ex machina is a crappy
way to end a story... Yeah, yeah, sometimes the journey is its own
reward. I certainly enjoyed much of the journey with BSG... But damn
it, doesn't anybody know how to write an ending any more? Writing 101,
kids. Adam and Eve, God Did It, It Was All a Dream? I've seen Clarion
students left stunned and bleeding for turning in stories with those
endings.[88]
Josh Tyler of Television Blend concluded that the series finale made
no real attempt to resolve any of the plotlines or mysteries set up
during the earlier run of the show.[89]
This is a response to the post seen at:
http://www.jlaforums.com/viewtopic.php?p=329264337#329264337