When the Sequel for

[Gatuzo]

When the Sequel for attlestar-galactica

[Your Name]

Post by Gatuzo
When the Sequel for attlestar-galactica

There's no such show to make a sequel for.


The real Battlestar Galactica had a sequel show way back in 1980, but
thanks to meddling and silly changes, it was complete crap .. it was
really "Space Scout Investigators Visit Earth" and had almost nothing
to do with real "Battlestar Galactica".

Moore-Ron's abysmally silly garbagised "reimagining" was so bad they
can't be bothered making a sequel show.

Various reports have about two or three different cinema movie versions
supposedly coming, but they're all be just as ridiculously stupid as
Moore-Ron's version and won't really be "Battlestar Galactica" in
anything but name and core idea.

[Gatuzo]

Post by Your Name

Post by Gatuzo
When the Sequel for attlestar-galactica

There's no such show to make a sequel for.
The real Battlestar Galactica had a sequel show way back in 1980,
but thanks to meddling and silly changes, it was complete crap ..
it was really "Space Scout Investigators Visit Earth" and had
almost nothing to do with real "Battlestar Galactica".
Moore-Ron's abysmally silly garbagised "reimagining" was so bad
they can't be bothered making a sequel show.
Various reports have about two or three different cinema movie
versions supposedly coming, but they're all be just as ridiculously
stupid as Moore-Ron's version and won't really be "Battlestar
Galactica" in anything but name and core idea.

I thinks After the 80' , Hollywood have no more Imagination and all
the crap now a reply of old movies or garbige

I remember about that and do not See like a Sequel of it , it was BAD
BAD !!

[Clu]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
I thinks After the 80' , Hollywood have no more Imagination and all
the crap now a reply of old movies or garbige
I remember about that and do not See like a Sequel of it , it was BAD
BAD !!

G80 (Galactica 1980) is enjoyable enough to watch on it's own. It is
like a comedy with Battlestar Galactica trappings. I think the
cyclones would make good ground roving vehicles, but should never have
flown.

Oh well. "In name only" is a term used a lot since the New Battlestar
came out. Luckily Doctor Who learned from this mistake and did not
ignore the past.

As for Star Trek, they started off saying "Ok the whole other universe
happened, this is a new universe." That was excellent. However with
the new trailer looking like "Star Trek the Fast and the Furious" well,
it looks like the new Trek is Trek in name only as well.

[Your Name]

Post by Clu

Post by Gatuzo
I thinks After the 80' , Hollywood have no more Imagination and all
the crap now a reply of old movies or garbige
I remember about that and do not See like a Sequel of it , it was BAD
BAD !!

G80 (Galactica 1980) is enjoyable enough to watch on it's own. It is
like a comedy with Battlestar Galactica trappings. I think the
cyclones would make good ground roving vehicles, but should never have
flown.
Oh well. "In name only" is a term used a lot since the New Battlestar
came out. Luckily Doctor Who learned from this mistake and did not
ignore the past.
As for Star Trek, they started off saying "Ok the whole other universe
happened, this is a new universe." That was excellent. However with
the new trailer looking like "Star Trek the Fast and the Furious" well,
it looks like the new Trek is Trek in name only as well.

Nope, Jar Jar Abrams "Crap Trek" is just yet another "ignore the past,
steal the name, and butcher the ideas" reboot that doesn't actually fit
with anything that came before (despite the silly "alternate universe"
nonsense).

I haven't seen the new Star Wars movie yet, but from the trailers and
reviews I have seen for it so far, it looks like Jar Jar Abrams has
also done an idiotic "reboot" with Star Wars too and again tried to
claim it's part of the same franchise by calling it "Episode VII" and
including original cast again ... but it appears all he's really done
is remake the original, butchering it, and adding his own hopeless
"fan-wank" ideas. :-(

The guy's a talentless cretin and everything he touches turns to
over-hype, idiotic, ill-fitting crap. :-(